Sunday, July 27, 2014

Moderationalists

I want to start a new political group: Moderationalists.

Moderately liberal, moderately conservative.

Illegal immigrants: I don't believe children should be citizens of the united states just because they're born here, their parents/guardians should have to be citizens. People should be able to immigrate to the United States, but only legally.

Biology lesson: When an egg is fertilized, the cells begin to multiply, at this point it is LIVING. Yes it may be IN your body but it's not your body, it's a completely different being. So should abortion be legal? Well, there are gray areas as there always is. But I don't believe it should be for the general population. As we are EQUAL, if a father can't kill his child, why can you? Gray areas include rape and if it would be lethal to the mother, I don't know exactly where I stand there.

Drugs. First of all, some "drugs" are completely natural, i.e. marijuana. Medically marijuana can be very helpful and should definitely be equal and covered by insurance. Other drugs (meth, heroine, etc.) should never be legal. Recreationally, there are again gray areas. I believe it could be legalized for recreational use with an age limit and stipulations. Cigarettes, in my opinion, should be illegal. They are bad for the environment, they are extremely bad for the person that is smoking them, they are bad for anyone that is around/walks past that person when they are smoking. They should have been illegal a looong time ago.

Guns. First of all I just want to point out that no one is trying to take all your guns away. If you think that you should really educate yourself on the political standpoints. I'm very gray on guns as well. I believe there need to be stronger restrictions for people who live in a household with someone who is mentally unstable. There are more restrictions that could be placed without ever impeding one's "right to bear arms" so don't get your panties in a bunch.

Gay marriage. This should be legalized nationwide, the fact that it's been handled in a state-by-state matter seems ridiculous to me. There are right you can get from the nation as a married couple, and if you are married you should always be viewed as such, you shouldn't have to worry about moving into a state where you wouldn't be considered married. Also, there's absolutely nothing about it that affects anyone other than the people involved in the relationship. It doesn't cause mutated children (as it would if you married your sibling or first cousin) and YOUR religion has absolutely nothing to do with their lives, they aren't forcing your church to marry them.

Taxes: Taxes need to be in place. We run our country off them, and people with disabilities need some way to survive. But there are ways they could be better dealt with.

Government officials' salaries: Why in the world should congressmen and other government officials be paid for the rest of their lives after they are out of office? And THAT much? No. The rest of the world has to work their almost their entire lives and take money out of their pay to build a retirement fund to suffice for when they are too old to work. You sit in a chair and make decisions based on your constituents? And there are soldiers over seas risking their lives everyday? But YOU'RE the one getting paid tons of money the rest of your life? That's not right.

On that note, veterans: My grandfather served two tours in Vietnam, saved lives. Volunteered for the second tour because he wanted to go back to the village he was protecting because he cared about those people, and as a soldier it was his duty. He came back to the United States only to be shunned by his country because they didn't agree with the war, which wasn't at all his fault. There are many people like him in this country. Do you know what they have to go through to simply go to the doctor because of the lack of VA clinics? He waited over a year just to fix a tooth. It's not right. Whether you agree with the war that's being fought or not, these people are heroes. They put their lives on the line to save others, and they should be treated like heroes.

Foreign affairs: Have you ever heard the saying "Before you help others, you must first help yourself"? Imagine, just for a moment, if we withdrew our troops. If we focused on defense only. If we used our oil, we used American made products only, and we help the Americans that are starving right now instead of trying to help everyone else when we are in debt. (Maybe we could even wean ourselves off oil in that time and try alternative sources that are cheaper and better for the environment) Just for six months or a year. We would create tons of jobs, or economy would boom. We could really grow. And after that time, maybe our country would be more unified, as it would be healthier. Maybe at that point more people would be behind helping other countries because we wouldn't have to worry about ourselves. I know it sounds impossible, but just imagine.

Animals: I'm going to add this in here, and don't completely discredit me because you have the "animals don't matter as much as people" mindset. Because they matter just about as much. And first of all, no living creature should have to suffer before it dies, I don't care if it'll "just be food anyway" that's no excuse for torture. Did you know one of the earliest signs of someone who is a psychopath is torturing animals? So why don't we take that seriously? Second point: The number of species on the planet are rapidly decreasing, greatly because of our actions. Imagine someday when you want to go fishing and there's only two or three different species available. How boring and disappointing would that be? Or hunting. My dad duck hunts and I like seeing all the different colors and markings of the ducks he gets. Or one day at your bird feeder maybe there will only be one kind of bird, because we killed off the rest. Does anyone enjoy listening to the frogs in the spring? All the different songs they sing? Gone. Amphibians are most susceptible to pollution and would likely be the first to go. You know what happens with less frogs? More flys.  Every creature has a place in the ecosystem.

The death penalty: Why is it so bad again? So someone kills an entire family (or even one person) and we put him/her in a room and pay for him/her to eat three meals a day and sleep in a safe bed? A life for a life. (If it was on purpose) Someone has sexually assaulted multiple people, and every time he/she gets out of prison he/she does it again? Why are we keeping him/her alive again? If you are contributing only awful things to our world why are you in it. But of course, not every crime deserves the death penalty.

Extremism is bad. There are almost always grey areas, but there are some things that are definitely wrong and definitely right.


Tuesday, July 1, 2014

"A person is a person, no matter how small" (~Dr. Suess)

Picture these three scenarios: 

1. A pregnant woman is on her way to an ultrasound when her car is struck by a drunk driver. She and her unborn child are killed in the accident, the police rule it double vehicular homicide and the offender is to go to prison for it. 

2. A pregnant woman decides she doesn't want her unborn child, she goes to an abortion clinic. They give her the information they are required to and in the end she still decides to go through with it, nobody does/can do anything about it. 

3. A pregnant woman is on her way to get and abortion and is struck by a drunk driver. Her unborn child is killed. 

What happens in the last scenario? Do they say "Well, since she decided she didn't want the child it's not considered a living being and you get off without a homicide charge." ? When is a fetus considered a child in the eyes of the law? Only when the mother decides it is? 

Biologically life begins at conception. When an egg is fertilized it becomes a zygote and the cells begin to multiply. Not only do they multiply, but they differentiate, some become cells for the heart, or the skin, or the brain, etc. At this point, this baby is alive. 

Yet a mother can choose to dispose of it because it's "their body" No. It is not just their body anymore. Inside of them is a second, completely separate body. A separate being, a separate mind. A potential. Something that could be someone big. Someone who has the potential to come into this world and make a huge difference someday. 

What if Einstein's mother had gotten an abortion? Or Martin Luther King Jr? Or Abraham Lincoln? Or Mother Teresa? Or Gandhi? Or Benjamin Franklin? 

We give this choice to women to change the future of this world. And often times, it's for their own selfish desires. They don't want a child, they got pregnant too young, they don't want the damage done to their body, etc. 

So prevent it before hand, go on birth control. Use a condom. Do both! The chances of getting pregnant are extremely slim with either of these, and practically nothing with both. If you are that worried about having a child then do something about it before you conceive one. 

Feminists are in an uproar. Trying to prove some point that women deserve the choice to choose, trying to say men are against them and that people who are anti-abortion are anti-women's rights. Stop. Please stop. Because if men could have children, people who are against abortion wouldn't want men to get them either. 

Hobby Lobby is still covering 16 forms of birth control under their health care, isn't that enough? Why should anyone have to pay for you to kill a child. No matter how you "look at it" science wins out, after conception it is a living thing. You have to be completely self absorbed to think that someone should pay to kill your child for you. 

I've seen comments and tweets about Hobby Lobby covering Viagra and Vasectomies and how that is "completely unfair." No it's not. That has absolutely everything to do with the man in question and in no way affects another living being. And they never said they wouldn't cover a woman getting her tubes tied or female hormone enhancing drugs. Those would be the equivalents, abortion and morning after pills are not even close to the same thing as Viagra or a vasectomy. 

I'm a scientific person, not a religious one. And science makes this wrong as much as any religion does. 

Go ahead and do what you will as long as it's legal (even if it shouldn't be) but do NOT criticize me or anyone else for refusing to pay for your decision.